accommodating employees with environmental sensitivities - All email cuba 2016 and dating forum

I think Ms Penny might need to get out of London a little more often and widely. She does eventually get round to something approximating an insight.This was not just a vote against Europe, but a vote against Westminster and the entirety of mainstream politics.Everyone offended by the actions of the others, seemingly pleased with the smell of their own…opinion. ’ Each side seemed keen to paint the other as variously racist, or stupid or right-wing. There were, it is quite true, noisome and emboldened racists and closet Xenophobes who were gleefully paraded and quoted by The Sun and The Guardian alike, though for opposite purposes.

all email cuba 2016 and dating forum-82

Mobirise is perfect for non-techies who are not familiar with the intricacies of web development and for designers who prefer to work as visually as possible, without fighting with code.

Also great for pro-coders for fast prototyping and small customers' projects.

The bigot’s eye view of all those who she lumps together in her glib and condescending description of parochial, lizard-brained, stupid people who are full of fear and empty of concern except for their pensions. I think this is a reference to John Major’s cricket playing idyll.

So our choices according to Ms Penny is a ‘Remain’ Britain filed with options and choices or a ‘Leave’ Britain, which is some pastiche of small town suburban and rural England where stupid working class people vote like turkeys for tea-on-the-lawn- white people.

A glimmer of understanding beyond the rhetoric and generalisations. Is it not an ‘option’ to wish to deal such an undead monster a blow? Who voted according to a logic which Ms Penny is either ignorant of or finds inconvenient to admit exists. But all this vote has done is bring the battle nearer. The outlines of the fight are perhaps less easy to ignore that’s all.

Perhaps there were some ‘leave’ voters who voted because, on balance, they thought doing so would do more to shake the hegemonic certainties of neoliberal globalism that all the major parties surrendered to a generation ago? I agree with the author when she says, When I spoke for Remain I suggested it was not simply about what people wanted to leave, but that they should think hard about what they would be left with. And this battle, THE battle of our time, will require a courage and a faith in each other that we are squandering with every word of this bilious brexit name-calling.

Every political party campaigned hard for a “Remain” vote – but Britain still chose to Leave, even if we’re regretting it this morning. But I dislike the bigoted generalizations and crude stereotyping of the Leave voters.

Now surely there is a realisation there, at odds with all that preceded it. And I say that not because I am a depressed, craven xenophobe, but because I have thought about it. I met some of them and some of them were thoughtful and considered, decent people.

Laurie Penny begins by describing the vote as a victory of, Straight out of the gate, Ms Penny suggests that Remain was guided by ‘common sense’, while Leave and its voters were ruled by prejudice, naked xenophobia or craven fear. Apparently the referendum was a painful catastrophe of good people with common sense, being smothered by a mob of stupid people. Does the author have an inkling where this stupidity lurks? And this lizard-brained, lack of caring goes along with a selfish concern with their own personal welfare. No room here for different reasons, different thinking, different world views.

The author seems above all to want to control how we see the debate.

But to the knackered rabble of the north it sounds like a glimpse of a true desire. I am sure Ms Penny is well-intentioned and essentially good-hearted.

Tags: , ,